Regardless of what side of the argument you land on, it is undeniable that the Supreme Court’s decisions on these cases could have major implications for Silicon Valley and all of the companies who rely on them to promote their content. As marketers, we have a responsibility to be conscious of how the messages we share can impact consumers. Not only that, but we must also consider the effects the channels in which we share our content affect the wellbeing of our customers, employees, collaborators, and the larger community. 

The fate of Section 230 could lead to immense changes in the way that the major companies who run the internet conduct business. This could mean algorithms and advertising conventions as we know them change entirely. Be sure that your business acts accordingly and is making decisions that reflect the future you’d like to see for your company. 

UPDATE (5/30/23):



The Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Google and Twitter in the two cases concerning Section 230. The decision on Twitter v. Taamneh was unanimous, showing that the court is currently standing with Silicon Valley. In the case of Gonzalez vs. Google, the court ruled that Google was too “removed” from the incident to be held liable.This means that Google and Twitter will continue to not be held liable for any harmful or dangerous content published on their sites by any of their users. If any changes are to be made to the protections that Section 230 grants social media platforms, it will now be up to Congress to revise the law. This story continues to develop, and it appears that the conversation surrounding Section 230 is far from over.